@Article{MalhiGGDSMHSAAAGIBFPMS:2017:WhCaBu,
author = "Malhi, Yadvinder and Girardin, C{\'e}cile A. J. and Goldsmith,
Gregory R. and Dought, Christopher E. and Salinas, Norma and
Metcalfe, Daniel B. and Huasco, Walter Huaraca and Silva-Espejo,
Javier E. and Aguilla-Pasquell, Jhon del and Am{\'e}zquita, Filio
Farf{\'a}n and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de and
Guerrieri, Rossella and Ishida, Franc{\'o}ise Yoko and Bahar, Nur
H. A. and Farfan-Rios, William and Phillips, Oliver L. and Meir,
Patrick and Silman, Miles",
affiliation = "{University of Oxford} and {University of Oxford} and {Paul
Scherrer Institute} and {University of Oxford} and {University of
Oxford} and {Lund University} and {Universidad Nacional San
Antonio Abad del Cusco} and {Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad
del Cusco} and IIAP and {Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del
Cusco} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona} and {James Cook University}
and {The Australian National University} and {Wake Forest
University} and {University of Leeds} and {University of
Edinburgh} and {Wake Forest University}",
title = "The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical
elevation gradient: a whole carbon budget perspective",
journal = "New Phytologist",
year = "2017",
volume = "214",
number = "3",
pages = "1019--1032",
month = "May",
keywords = "climate, cloud forest, Global Ecosystems Monitoring network (GEM),
photosynthesis, physiology, RAINFOR, temperature.",
abstract = "Why do forest productivity and biomass decline with elevation? To
address this question, research to date generally has focused on
correlative approaches describing changes in woody growth and
biomass with elevation. We present a novel, mechanistic approach
to this question by quantifying the autotrophic carbon budget in
16 forest plots along a 3300 m elevation transect in Peru. Low
growth rates at high elevations appear primarily driven by low
gross primary productivity (GPP), with little shift in either
carbon use efficiency (CUE) or allocation of net primary
productivity (NPP) between wood, fine roots and canopy. The lack
of trend in CUE implies that the proportion of photosynthate
allocated to autotrophic respiration is not sensitive to
temperature. Rather than a gradual linear decline in productivity,
there is some limited but nonconclusive evidence of a sharp
transition in NPP between submontane and montane forests, which
may be caused by cloud immersion effects within the cloud forest
zone. Leaf-level photosynthetic parameters do not decline with
elevation, implying that nutrient limitation does not restrict
photosynthesis at high elevations. Our data demonstrate the
potential of whole carbon budget perspectives to provide a deeper
understanding of controls on ecosystem functioning and carbon
cycling.",
doi = "10.1111/nph.14189",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14189",
issn = "0028-646X",
language = "en",
targetfile = "malhi_variation.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}